The personal information of users of the video game chat platform has been compromised. The personal information of users of the video game chat platform has been compromised. Video game chat platform tells users that driver's licences and passports were among the forms of data accessed via a third-party customer service provider Video game chat platform Discord has suffered a data breach, informing users that their personal information - including identity documents of those required to prove their age - were compromised. The company stated last week that an unauthorised party had compromised one of Discord's third-party customer service providers, leading to the access of "a limited number of users" who had been in contact with the customer service or trust and safety teams. The data compromised may have included usernames, email, billing information, the last four digits of credit card numbers, IP addresses and messages with customer support.

Voluntary commitments are central to international AI governance, as demonstrated by recent voluntary guidelines from the White House to the G7, from Bletchley Park to Seoul. How do major AI companies make good on their commitments? We score companies based on their publicly disclosed behavior by developing a detailed rubric based on their eight voluntary commitments to the White House in 2023. We find significant heterogeneity: while the highest-scoring company (OpenAI) scores a 83% overall on our rubric, the average score across all companies is just 53%. The companies demonstrate systemically poor performance for their commitment to model weight security with an average score of 17%: 11 of the 16 companies receive 0% for this commitment. Our analysis highlights a clear structural shortcoming that future AI governance initiatives should correct: when companies make public commitments, they should proactively disclose how they meet their commitments to provide accountability, and these disclosures should be verifiable. To advance policymaking on corporate AI governance, we provide three directed recommendations that address underspecified commitments, the role of complex AI supply chains, and public transparency that could be applied towards AI governance initiatives worldwide.

Drive down the 280 freeway in San Francisco and you might believe AI is everywhere, and everything. Nearly every billboard advertises an AI related product: "We've Automated 2,412 BDRs." "All that AI and still no ROI?" "Cheap on-demand GPU clusters." It's hard to know if you're interpreting the industry jargon correctly while zooming past in your vehicle. The signs are just one example of the tech industry's en-masse pivot to AI, a technology that the executives who have the most to gain from it say will be universe-shifting, inevitable and unavoidable. In California's tech heartland, every company is now an AI company, just like every company became a tech company sometime in the 2010s.

In his polarizing "Techno-Optimist Manifesto" last year, venture capitalist Marc Andreessen listed a number of enemies to technological progress. Among them were "tech ethics" and "trust and safety," a term used for work on online content moderation, which he said had been used to subject humanity to "a mass demoralization campaign" against new technologies such as artificial intelligence. Andreessen's declaration drew both public and quiet criticism from people working in those fields--including at Meta, where Andreessen is a board member. Critics saw his screed as misrepresenting their work to keep internet services safer. On Wednesday, Andreessen offered some clarification: When it comes to his 9-year-old son's online life, he's in favor of guardrails.